Why Kingdom Metrics
We make AI sensors that count church attendance. This page is about the why.
What we believe
Thriving churches make for thriving communities. When a congregation is healthy — financially stable, relationally engaged, growing or holding steady with intent — its surrounding community feels it. We won't claim causation, but the correlations are durable: religiously-active Americans are measurably more civically engaged and generous with their time and money1; US religion contributes roughly $1.2 trillion a year in social and economic value2; the average urban congregation generates around $1.7M a year in measurable, non-religious community good3; religiously-active youth show better outcomes across civic engagement and social trust4. The pattern is real enough to build a company around.
Churches that can see clearly make better decisions. Volunteer headcounts and check-in scans pull in opposite directions — counters drift high, kiosks miss anyone who walks past. Either way, pastors planning the next service or the next campus are working off bad data. We can fix that.
A number is not a story. The number supports the story. A camera tells you 1,324 people walked in last weekend. It doesn't tell you who they were or how their lives are changing. Numbers exist so pastors can ask better questions — not replace pastoring with dashboards.
What we'd default to doing
We'd keep prices moving down. Hardware is $449, subscription is $49.99/month. We started low rather than starting high and discounting our way into deals. If costs fall as we scale, the price moves with them.
We'd serve before we sell. A small church that already counts every person walking in doesn't need a $450 sensor yet. We've told customers to wait, to buy the cheaper hardware at cost, to come back when they actually need us.
We'd take daily bread, not more. When the balance sheet is large enough to support more, we'd commit to taking what we need and putting the rest somewhere useful — payroll, tithe, customer benefit. We'd rather build something durable than capture a windfall.
What we refuse to do
No facial recognition. No biometrics. The sensors don't see faces, don't fingerprint anyone, don't track identity by anything a person is. If a church wants to know who's in the room, we'll help — through opt-in check-in, ChMS integration, methods a congregant can consent to — but never by recognizing them. This isn't a roadmap-deferral. It's a line.
We won't fight the numbers. The dashboard shows what the camera saw. We don't massage counts up to flatter, or down to push an upgrade.
We won't sell our way into bad deals. A contract that would force us to lay off co-owners — we'd pass. A buyout that would chop up the company and walk us away rich while everyone else got nothing — we'd pass.
This page is written in three tenses on purpose. Beliefs are stated as facts. Defaults as orientations — what we'd do absent reason to do otherwise. Commitments with teeth as present-tense rules; if we ever change one, we'd say so out loud.
Notes
- Putnam & Campbell, American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us, 2010.
- Grim & Grim, "The Socio-economic Contribution of Religion to American Society," Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion, 2016.
- Cnaan et al., Philadelphia congregations "halo effect" studies, University of Pennsylvania.
- Smith et al., National Study of Youth and Religion, University of Notre Dame / UNC.